Congressman Dan Goldman Urges New York State Lawmakers to Reform Discovery Laws in Upcoming Budget
March 25, 2025
CONGRESSMAN DAN GOLDMAN URGES NEW YORK STATE LAWMAKERS TO REFORM DISCOVERY LAWS IN UPCOMING BUDGET
Well-Meaning 2019 Reforms Have Led to Spike in Number of Cases Dismissed on Procedural Technicalities, Not Merit
Onerous Discovery Requirements Have Hindered Law Enforcement’s Ability to Effectively Address Public Safety
Read the Letter Here
Washington, DC – Congressman Dan Goldman (NY-10) today led a letter alongside Representatives Ritchie Torres (NY-15), Tom Suozzi (NY-03), and Laura Gillen (NY-04) to New York Governor Hochul, Majority Leader Stewart Cousins, and Speaker Carl Heastie urging them to make much-needed reforms to the New York’s discovery laws in the upcoming budget. The members’ proposed reforms enhance state and local law enforcement's ability to police public safety while ensuring New York maintains its strong criminal justice protections for defendants.
The members proposed various changes to New York’s discovery laws, including requiring proof of prejudice before dismissing cases for discovery noncompliance, ensuring cases are only dismissed when a defendant’s ability to defend themselves is seriously harmed, and mandating that defense attorneys raise discovery issues within 35 days of receiving the Certificate of Compliance to prevent delays. Additionally, the members clarified that only materials directly relevant to the charges should be disclosed, reducing the burden of gathering irrelevant documents on prosecutors and law enforcement.
"As the law currently stands, prosecutors must disclose a broad range of materials—some of which may be irrelevant or have little to no evidentiary value—within a narrow timeframe under penalty of case dismissal. This rigid standard has resulted in thousands of dismissals of criminal cases each year, including serious cases, often with no regard to the merits or fairness of the original charge,” the members wrote.
In 2019, New York State implemented significant reforms to discovery laws, requiring disclosure of evidence be provided to defendants within 15 days of their indictment. While the reforms were aimed at increasing transparency, they have forced prosecutors to dismiss large amounts of cases on procedural technicalities, hindering law enforcement’s ability to effectively address public safety.
“Prosecutors, in their effort to comply with the voluminous and often irrelevant discovery requirements, are frequently forced to dismiss cases simply because they were unable to compile and turn over every last piece of material within the mandated timeframe. Additionally, burdensome discovery requirements require both prosecutors and police officers to spend significant time obtaining often irrelevant materials, time that could be better spent investigating and prosecuting other cases,” the members continued.
With lawmakers crafting the state budget already, the members urged state officials to pursue these commonsense reforms while maintaining New York’s robust protections for criminal defendants.
“By making these adjustments to our discovery laws, New York can continue to be a national leader in criminal justice reform, while ensuring that victims of crime do not suffer further from a system that fails to deliver justice in a timely manner,” the members concluded.
Read full letter here or below:
Dear Governor Hochul, Majority Leader Stewart-Cousins, and Speaker Heastie:
We are writing to urge the State to include meaningful reforms to New York’s discovery laws in the upcoming budget to ensure a fair and effective criminal justice system that safeguards both the rights of the accused and victims of crime. We were encouraged to see many of these reforms included in the Governor’s budget proposal and hope they will be part of the final budget agreement.
As you are aware, in 2019, New York State implemented significant reforms to its discovery laws, requiring earlier and more comprehensive disclosure of evidence to defendants in criminal cases. These reforms were critical in improving fairness by allowing defendants to make informed decisions about their cases and avoiding guilty pleas based on ignorance of the prosecution’s evidence. However, while the intent behind these reforms was commendable, they have led to some unintended negative consequences that are undermining public safety and the administration of justice.
As the law stands, prosecutors must disclose a wide range of materials—some of which may be irrelevant or have little to no evidentiary value—within a narrow timeframe under penalty of case dismissal. This rigid standard has resulted in the dismissal of thousands of criminal cases each year, including serious ones, often without consideration for the merits or fairness of the original charge. According to the New York County District Attorney’s Office, New York City’s case dismissal rate jumped to 62% in 2023, up from 42% in 2019 before the reforms. In total, this represents a 48% increase in dismissals and 20,538 cases dismissed citywide in 2023 compared to 2019. While a rise in dismissals doesn’t automatically indicate a process issue, the scale and frequency of technical dismissals suggest that changes are needed to ensure justice is served.
Additionally, while the original goal of the discovery reforms was to promote transparency and fairness, their current implementation has overwhelmed our criminal justice system. Prosecutors, in their attempt to comply with the extensive and often irrelevant discovery requirements, are frequently forced to dismiss cases because they could not compile and provide all the necessary materials within the mandated timeframe. Moreover, the burdensome discovery requirements demand significant time from both prosecutors and police officers to gather often irrelevant materials—time that could be better spent investigating and prosecuting other cases.
This is not merely an issue of fairness; it reflects the consequences of an overly broad and inflexible statute that fails to balance the rights of the accused with the need to protect victims and maintain public safety.
In light of these challenges, we urge you to take the following actions to refine and improve New York’s discovery laws:
- Require proof of prejudice before dismissing cases for discovery noncompliance: To avoid dismissals unrelated to trial fairness, we propose that the Legislature amend CPL § 30.30(5) to apply the same standard for dismissal based on prejudice as used in CPL § 245.80. This would ensure cases are not dismissed due to technicalities, but only when the defendant’s ability to defend themselves is substantially harmed. We also urge that the remedy for noncompliance be the exclusion of evidence provided after the deadline.
- Mandate timely challenges by the defense: Under current law, defense attorneys can wait until after the speedy trial clock expires to raise discovery issues, causing delays and undermining the reforms' original goal. We recommend requiring defense attorneys to raise discovery issues within 35 days of receiving the prosecution's Certificate of Compliance, with any unraised issues waived unless the court extends the deadline for good cause. This would help prevent tactical delays and ensure timely justice for victims.
- Clarify materials for disclosure in the Certificate of Compliance (COC): The law currently requires prosecutors to disclose all materials “relating to” a case, regardless of relevance, leading to unnecessary searches for irrelevant records. We propose a more reasonable standard, where prosecutors must file the COC once all materials directly relevant to the charges have been disclosed, based on a good faith effort to locate necessary evidence. This would maintain transparency and fairness, while reducing wasteful efforts to find non-evidentiary documents.
These reforms will help balance justice for the accused with the protection of victims’ rights and make the criminal justice system more efficient, reducing unnecessary dismissals while preserving the integrity of the discovery process.
Even with these changes, New York will remain a national leader in transparency, maintaining the strictest link between discovery compliance and speedy trial laws, distinguishing it from other states like California, New Jersey, and Texas. While other states have less stringent timelines or more limited remedies for nondisclosure, New York imposes the broadest duty on prosecutors to quickly identify and disclose both direct and tangentially related evidence, including materials affecting the credibility of law enforcement witnesses. These reforms will maintain New York’s leadership in ensuring transparency while balancing fairness for both defendants and victims.
We ask for your leadership in championing these commonsense reforms during the upcoming legislative session. By making these adjustments to our discovery laws, New York can continue to be a national leader in criminal justice reform, while ensuring that victims of crime do not suffer further from a system that fails to deliver justice in a timely manner.
Thank you for your attention to this critical issue. We look forward to your support in making New York’s criminal justice system more just, effective, and fair for all.
###
Issues:Criminal Justice Reform